Press Ethics Comparison

October 11, 2009
Function 1: Showing Accountability to the Public


Press Ethics

Singapore

Malaysia Indonesia Philippines Thailand India South Korea Japan China
1. Truthfulness, honesty, accuracy of

information

X X X X X X X X X
2. Essentiality of information X X X X X X X X X
3. Diversity and plurality of information X X X
4. Objectivity of information X X X X X X X X X
5. Checking the facts and the sources X X X X
6. Correction of errors X X X X X X X
7. Duty to publish press council’s

statements

8. Separation of facts and opinions X X X
9. Separation of advertisements and

editorial

X X
10. Prohibition of selection and

misrepresentation

X
11. Coverage of headlines in the text X
12. Duty to serve as a watchdog of

authority

X
13. Freedom of expression, speech,

comment, criticism

X X X X X X
14. Public’s right to express opinion X X
15. Journalists’ responsibility over

everything reported by him/her

X X X X X X
16. Prohibition of discrimination on the

basis of race/ethnicity/nationality

X X X X X X
17. Prohibition of discrimination on the

basis of religion/etc.

X X X X X X
18. Respect for good taste in expression X X X X
19. Respect for common values X X X X
20. Prohibition of praising/inciting

crimes and violence

X X X
21. Respect for other states and nations X X X
Function 2: Showing Accountability to the Sources and Referents


Press Ethics

Singapore

Malaysia Indonesia Philippines Thailand India South Korea Japan China
22. Fair means in information collection X X X X X X X X
23. Respect for the copyright and laws of

quoting

X X X X X
24. Respect for embargo
25. Right of the source to check the

correctness of information

26. Prohibition of slander, libel,

unfounded accusations

X X X X X X
27. Right to reply X X X
28. Respect for privacy X X X X X X X X
29. Special consideration in reporting

crimes, accidents, etc.

X X X X
30. Resumption of innocence X X X
Function 3: Showing accountability to the State

31. Duty to observe the laws X
32. Protection of state interests X X X X
Function 4: Showing accountability to the Employers


33. Prohibition to misuse journalistic

position in order to get personal

benefits

X X X X X X
34. Respect for the agreed rules of the

working place

X X X
35. Prohibition to offer one’s work to

several publishers

Function 5: Protection of the Journalists’ Professional Integrity from outside Interference


Press Ethics

Singapore

Malaysia Indonesia Philippines Thailand India South Korea Japan China
36. Prohibition to accept bribes or any

other benefits

X X X X X X
37. Prohibition to allow any outsider to

have influence on the journalistic

work

X X X
38. Right to free investigation X X X
39. Free access to all information sources X X X
40. Fight against censorship X X X
41. Rejection of interference by public

authorities

X X
42. Professional secrecy X X X X X X X X
43. Conscience clauses X
44. Right to refuse assignments

contradictory to the code of ethics

X X
45. Right to refuse assignments

contradictory to the editorial policy

X X
46. Journalists’ author’s rights
47. Right to proper payment and/or

working conditions

48. Right to take part in the decision-

making of the company

Function 6: Protection of the Status and the Unity of the Journalistic Profession


Press Ethics

Singapore

Malaysia Indonesia Philippines Thailand India South Korea Japan China
49. Duty to fight against concentration
50. Duty to work for the good name of

the profession

X X X X X X X
51. Duty to follow the code of ethics X X X X
52. Stress on the special status of the

journalistic profession

X X X X
53. Avoidance of an interest conflict:

incompatibility of journalism and

other activities

X X X X X X X X
54. Defense of professional solidarity and

the laws of fair competition

X X X
55. Respect for the professional

organization

Note: X = presence

Note: This 55 items were taken from the classification scheme from a study of European Journalistic Codes of Ethics


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.